Global Research Center

On March 10th and 11th we went up to Schenchdaty to check out the GE Global Research Center. Over the two days we saw a kind of crazy amount of stuff, from nano coatings that are superhydrophobic to a scanner for use in pathology labs to a pulse detonation engine that’s been attached to what is in effect a giant horn to clean out super dirty spaces.


Blogging the Bloggers

September 30th, 2009

For our trip to GE Healthcare in Wisconsin we were joined by Adam Rasheed who works on pulsed detonation engines at the Global Research Center. Anyway, Adam wrote a post about the experience of hanging out with us and had a bunch of interesting observations (it’s always fascinating to read how you’re perceived by others). Here’s one of my favorites:

From the perspective of innovation, I learned quite a bit. I am still trying to sort through it in my head, but there are a few things that really stood out. One thing is that a lot of the folks I met are involved in something based off the internet, and their medium is information. This is pretty fascinating environment. Because the “barrier to entry” is so low, it’s relatively easy to very quickly try many different things on the web – and just see which one sticks. And that appears to be one of the keys to coming up with ideas… many cheap and quick iterations to maximize your ability to learn. I am trying to figure out how to apply this to my world, where it simply isn’t practical to build 10 different designs for a jet engine (at billions of dollars and many years of development) – and then take the best one – we’d go out of business! But it is something we can do on a smaller scale in the lab.

Pulsed Detonation Engine

August 3rd, 2009

Just realizing that we never posted this video explanation from the GRC.

For some more information about PDEs, check out the GRC blog.

More MEMS (Circuit Breakers)

April 20th, 2009

MEMS are micro electromechanical systems. As I understand it, that pretty much means they’re tiny chips with moving parts.

The example the team at GE gave us to help us understand how and why they matter is circuit breakers. Think of the box you have at home that’s full of a bunch of black switches which trip if there’s some sort of surge. Those things take milliseconds to flip open and protect, during which time the current can rise to thousands of amps, which could short something. With a MEMS breaker, however, that time is limited to microseconds, thanks in large part to the fact that the switch just has less distance to travel (it’s the difference between turning a light switch the size of the one on your wall and one that would fit on a microchip).

Here’s the MEMS team explaining:

(If you are looking to learn more about circuit breakers, head on over to How Stuff Works, though I think I’ve done a fair job describing it.)

Where this technology becomes especially interesting is in large industrial settings where you might be dealing with millions of dollars of equipment. Frying something at that size can have a big impact on business. Craziness.

The team at GE explains:

PLASMA for AIRPLANE WINGS.

April 16th, 2009

There was some heady stuff we saw at the Global Research Center.

Here’s one of my favorites.  Check out this drawing:

via http://www.pilotstudio.com/ps/  (good site for basic airplane physics)

via http://www.pilotstudio.com/ps/ (good site for basic airplane physics)

This is a reasonably simple thing to understand: in the top image, the plane is still flying because the air is flowing around the wing, and is creating lift, because the shape of the wing makes the air move faster on one side vs. the other.  In the lower image, the air is not flowing around the wing shape, and thus is not creating it’s own lift. The plane will stall and potentially crash.   This is not great.

So GE engineers have found a potential solution, using plasma- the 4th state of matter.  Science, FTW!

Ok so plasma, a super simple explaination is this:

In a solid, molecules are not moving (much).  In a liquid, molecules are moving around.  In a gas, molecules are moving around more, with more energy.  In plasma, it is a gas-like distribution of molecules, but the electrical state of the molecules is excited.  Like super excited – in other states, the molecules are stable, but in plasma the  electrical bonds of the molecules are breaking down.  It is generally VERY HOT.

So there is the term “cold plasma” which is not so much cold, as it is not extremely hot, just really hot.  Its sort of the experimental safe plasma, and this example, it is created by taking two types of metal with a small distance between them, like a plastic film, and running electricity through the metal, and basically creating plasma as the electricity jumps from one metal to another.

Here’s a clip of the material:

Ok now the cool bit, is using that to DESTROY AIR:

So what you can do with this, in aerospace or for a turbine, is that you could run these strips along the length of a wing, and turn it on, and in the picture up top, when the plane was stalling ?  well, the plasma would break apart the molecular bond of the air, and it would create a less dense area of air, and the wind would stick to the wing of the plane, and the plane wouldn’t stall/crash.

This is super interesting to think about.  We need a better demo, it woudl be cool to see this at a larger scale, or faster even.   It would be interesting to see this visualized in other contexts.  My first thought was even just trying model airplane examples, with small cameras?

OLEDs: Organic LEDs

April 16th, 2009

We wrote about OLEDs a few weeks ago, and now we’ve cut the video of Anil from OLEDs explaining what they’re all about:

I could think of about a million fun things to do with that lighted glass.

Local-ness

April 14th, 2009

Whilst in the TRAILER OF MYSTERY at the Global Research Lab, we saw demos of GE’s VeriWise software/hardware products. More or less it is a mesh network that uses existing radio technology in a decentralized way to make truck fleets more efficient.

This brought up a half-idea I’d had ages ago while working on the tap project , which is to create a brand and mechanism to give some sort of authority to the distance a product traveled to get to you. Whether its a cucumber or a radio, people are starting to be concerned about the carbon footprint of what they buy, but there’s no standardization, no trustworthy gauge of local-ness that you can compare products to.

Seeing this system from GE that is designed to gather tremendous amounts of data, and then intelligently filter out only what you need (or ask for) leaves a lot of other useful data. So what if you could use the system that is already tracking distance traveled and checking in / out packages from warehouses and trucks to be some sort of data trail that authenticates how far a product traveled to get to you.

Interestingly, its such a huge goal of any company to increase effiency. Not only GE, but all the clients that could be in the market for this sort of system are insanely interested in shaving off minutes here, pennies there, because on a grand scale it makes a huge difference in profits. But its strangely not ever important to the end user to know how efficiently a product was made.

There’s all sorts of ways to go with this, but a simple first idea is to have a consistent iconic stamp of local-ness, or maybe in the same way that you have nutritional information on a package you have distance traveled. Something that will get people excited about companies that are more efficient than others.

Waiting for a Doctor

April 9th, 2009

One of the posts I was meaning to write was about the amount of time we spend in waiting rooms. It was inspired by a conversation we had with the Hospital of the Future folks. However, the Freakonomics blog beat me to the punch:

My calculations from data from the American Time Use Survey suggest that this is a standard problem: the average adult American spends four hours per year waiting for medical or dental care, with each wait averaging around 45 minutes.

Pricing this time out at even half the average wage rate, the cost amounts to about $5 billion per year. Seems like a lot, and very inefficient, but what is the alternative?

I can’t stand waiting at the doctor. I always wonder why I bother making appointments if I’m just going to have to sit around the waiting room for an hour. Ugh.

Following up on the very first post on this site, here’s Brian Lawrence explaining holographic data storage:

Learning to Forget

April 7th, 2009

As I mentioned in my post a few weeks ago, I was super excited to visit the trailer of the future and talk about digital asset management. A lot of the topics they’re discussing (machines talking to machines, large-scale networks, objects that can think) are pretty much in my sweet spot (at least when it comes to thinking/writing, not necessarily always understanding).

The GE Brain

One thing in particular stood out as super insightful, in talking about the amount of data they must collect (their systems track all the assets for Wal-Mart for instance), Joseph Salvo, who runs the department at the Global Research Center explained, “Most data you don’t need to remember, we just need the main signals.”

I love the idea that it’s not about remembering everything, but instead about knowing what to remember. Selective hearing, something my mother accused me of many times growing up, is actually incredibly valuable in this case as otherwise you could fill every hard drive in the world with all the tiny and generally useless details. In some ways I feel like this stands counter to what many people think about digital technology: That it offers a chance to record every micro-movement, whether it’s important or not. The reality of the situation, and I’ve heard this mentioned specifically in reference to electronic medical records many times, no matter how much our storage capacity grows worldwide we are just not going to be able to afford to store everything.

Anyway, with all of that out of the way, here’s a video of the team explaining what they’re up to inside that trailer of theirs:

Photo from 3dking on Flickr. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic license.