Posts Tagged ‘Energy’

Perspective

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

It’s hard to comprehend big numbers. Most of the numbers around energy consumption are big. With that in mind, I found this helped me wrap my head around the need for alternative energy sources:

Take all the power stations in the United States. Together, they produce almost 5000 gigawatts of electricity – enough to boil several billion kettles simultaneously.

Now imagine building another five power stations for every one that already exists in the United States. That is about the amount of electricity generation that the world is on track to add over the next 20 years. And three-quarters of the new stations will use fossil fuels.

Five for one. That’s insane.

Smart Grid APIs

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Interesting. This blog post about the “Era of Open Energy Information” mentions the use of APIs, allowing developers to build their own tools that pulls in energy data. Makes perfect sense, but hadn’t really thought of it in those terms before. Still not quite sure I understand how the data is extracted from the smart grid receiver, but I’m assuming someone has figured that problem out. As we’ve seen proven on the web over and over again, once you open up the data nerds will find something fun to do with it. Of course there are some dangers of privacy, etc., but that’s the case with any new technology …

Smart Energy Usage

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

Commenting on Google’s Power Meter, Felix Salmon sums up the need for better information on individual energy consumption:

The behavioral sociology of measuring energy usage is simple: the more you know about how much energy you’re using, the less you use. Just getting the information cuts most people’s energy usage by somewhere between 5% and 15%, while people with high electricity bills (like me) find it much easier to isolate exactly what is causing those bills and can then work out how best to reduce them through upgrading appliances or replacing incandescent bulbs with CFLs or any number of other routes to energy efficiency.

Nicely put. (Via Kottke.org)

Letting People Know How Much They Save

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Not totally sure what the implications are, but this sticker caught my eye today.

I saw it in a bathroom and it says “This sticker will save up to 100lbs. of paper every year.” It also includes a link to the project’s website, TheseComeFromTrees.com. Just thought it was an interesting, albeit analog, example of communicating consumption to consumers. Maybe something to think about with smart grid/GE energy.

Making a Case for Wind

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Ran across an interesting article over at The Oil Drum: Europe that defends wind energy as a viable option for our energy needs. (As a side note I’ve been working on a longer entry about some of the stuff we learned about the economics of wind power that hopefully I can get finished this week.) Anyway, I found this chart comparing the growth of nuclear energy in the 60s and 70s to the growth of wind over the last 15 years particularly interesting:

wind vs nuclear

Interesting.

Psychology of Saving

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

So I may be a little obsessed with behavioral economics, but this article about how Obama is using it had some gems for both energy and health.

Which message would persuade homeowners to save electricity: a call to their environmental conscience, or an appeal to their wallet? Cialdini tested those approaches in a San Diego experiment, and the answer was neither. What worked was an appeal to conformity. Residents used less power when they were told their neighbors were using less power. We’re a herdlike species, more likely to be obese if our peers are.

Interesting to think about, especially as part of smart-grid applications. Maybe just showing savings isn’t enough.

And this quote about health data, while not exactly about behavioral economics is worth sharing/thinking about:

More information can make us healthier too, which is why the stimulus poured $1.1 billion into “comparative effectiveness” research. Orszag has reams of charts showing that medical tactics and costs vary wildly across the country, with little regard for what works. He’d like to document best practices — from emergency-room to-do lists that dramatically reduce infections to protocols for when pricey tests and surgeries really help — and then have all medical providers adopt them. This approach has helped American anesthesiologists reduce deaths as well as costs.

How can GE help to make more of this data public, available and easily sharable between both medical organizations and individuals?

3Tier

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Hrm, this is super interesting. Apparently there is a company called 3TIER that has a bunch of products to help people who are considering renewable energy products figure out the feasability. (The feasability studies at the beginning of any renewable project is apparently one of the more time and money consuming parts of the project. Part of the reason why EOS exists.)

Firstlook

Here’s how they describe one of their products, Firstlook (pictured above), on their site: “FirstLook Prospecting for wind is the first and only online tool that allows you to evaluate a potential site quickly and for a fraction of the cost of traditional methods.” You can even play around with it a bit here.

No idea if it actually works, but clearly there will be lots more entrepreneurs playing in this space in the future. I wonder whether we can’t find some good way for GE to support/promote folks like this. Seems to me like the more smooth and easy it is for people to get their renewable projects off the ground, the better it is for all of us (even if GE doesn’t normally sell single turbines).

Oh, and here’s the Forbes video interview with the CEO of 3TIER:

Spin

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

EOS Ventures

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

EOS VenturesThis was going to be a post about the economics of wind (which I will get to and add a link once I post), but I decided to first tell the story of how Jiminy Peak got their wind turbine. First, it’s important to understand that there aren’t a lot of other single wind turbines around, most of them are part of large wind farms. Jiminy Peak actually has “the only privately owned megawatt class turbine in the nation for on-site energy usage,” according to the EOS Ventures website. Basically, after going through the process of surveying and procuring the turbine the team at Jiminy learned a ton and decided to start a company to help others get their renewable energy projects off the ground.

Here are the steps they went through (which come from full case study outlining the process at the EOS site).

  1. Wetlands study for the access road and site.
  2. Wetlands assessment for surrounding area.
  3. Avian Assessment, (bird study).
  4. A determination by Massachusetts Environmental Protection Agency (MEPA) for an Environmental Notification Form (ENF).
  5. Study of rare and endangered species was completed.
  6. A letter of opinion was obtained from the National Heritage Society.
  7. Civil engineering analysis of site and access roads.
  8. Visual Impact Assessment of the project (photo simulations).

Then, once they finished all that and realized it was a viable option they went to talk to GE. Because GE doesn’t sell a 1 megawatt turbine (the smallest is a 1.5 mw) Jiminy had to go back to the drawing board and do a few more studies to make sure the larger turbine wouldn’t be an issue. This second round looked like this:

  1. A re-evaluation of the wind study and determination of how many kilowatt hours could be generated by a GE turbine indicated it will produce 4.6 MILLION KILOWATT HOURS of electricity. (Jiminy uses 7 million kilowatt hours).
  2. Turbulence data was necessary in order to assure there would be no excessive vibrations to the turbine over the useful life of the next 50 years. Historical weather information proved there are no turbulence concerns.
  3. The ability for the turbines connection into Jiminy’s electrical distribution and National Grid’s distribution system was satisfactory answered.
  4. Civil Engineering and contractor capabilities for hauling this heavier piece of equipment up the mountain and installing it was resolved.

Finally after everything was cleared they installed it (a whole other ordeal, since it’s not every day you need to get a structure of that size to the top of a ski mountain). The total cost $3.9 million and it’s predicted to take 8 years to pay back (all according to EOS of course).

Clearly not a very easy process, which is exactly why the team at Jiminy started EOS. Very interesting.

How Wind Tubines Work

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Our guide Ryan up at Jiminy Peak was kind enough to explain to us how turbines work. I’ll let you watch the video and learn for yourself, but here are a few highlights:

  • They run at a constant 22rpm (or as close it as possible), which they maintain by pitching the blades and turning the Nacelle.
  • All of this is handled automatically by a weather station on top.

Okay, I’ll let Ryan explain …