Posts Tagged ‘government’

EOS Ventures

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

EOS VenturesThis was going to be a post about the economics of wind (which I will get to and add a link once I post), but I decided to first tell the story of how Jiminy Peak got their wind turbine. First, it’s important to understand that there aren’t a lot of other single wind turbines around, most of them are part of large wind farms. Jiminy Peak actually has “the only privately owned megawatt class turbine in the nation for on-site energy usage,” according to the EOS Ventures website. Basically, after going through the process of surveying and procuring the turbine the team at Jiminy learned a ton and decided to start a company to help others get their renewable energy projects off the ground.

Here are the steps they went through (which come from full case study outlining the process at the EOS site).

  1. Wetlands study for the access road and site.
  2. Wetlands assessment for surrounding area.
  3. Avian Assessment, (bird study).
  4. A determination by Massachusetts Environmental Protection Agency (MEPA) for an Environmental Notification Form (ENF).
  5. Study of rare and endangered species was completed.
  6. A letter of opinion was obtained from the National Heritage Society.
  7. Civil engineering analysis of site and access roads.
  8. Visual Impact Assessment of the project (photo simulations).

Then, once they finished all that and realized it was a viable option they went to talk to GE. Because GE doesn’t sell a 1 megawatt turbine (the smallest is a 1.5 mw) Jiminy had to go back to the drawing board and do a few more studies to make sure the larger turbine wouldn’t be an issue. This second round looked like this:

  1. A re-evaluation of the wind study and determination of how many kilowatt hours could be generated by a GE turbine indicated it will produce 4.6 MILLION KILOWATT HOURS of electricity. (Jiminy uses 7 million kilowatt hours).
  2. Turbulence data was necessary in order to assure there would be no excessive vibrations to the turbine over the useful life of the next 50 years. Historical weather information proved there are no turbulence concerns.
  3. The ability for the turbines connection into Jiminy’s electrical distribution and National Grid’s distribution system was satisfactory answered.
  4. Civil Engineering and contractor capabilities for hauling this heavier piece of equipment up the mountain and installing it was resolved.

Finally after everything was cleared they installed it (a whole other ordeal, since it’s not every day you need to get a structure of that size to the top of a ski mountain). The total cost $3.9 million and it’s predicted to take 8 years to pay back (all according to EOS of course).

Clearly not a very easy process, which is exactly why the team at Jiminy started EOS. Very interesting.

Aircraft Signaling Beacons

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

Yesterday we climbed up the wind turbine at Jiminy Peak.

Now we’ll be writing a lot more about the trip, as well as posting more photo and video as soon as possible. However, I wanted to just get a quick post up about something I found interesting. During our tour we got to talking about the signaling beacons on top of the turbine. During the day there is a flashing white beacon and at night it goes to red (the white is so bright that when it accidentally stayed on one evening neighbors complained, thinking it was lightning). Anyway, I asked whether they knew the height requirements to have airplane beacons and no one was quite sure. So when I got back I did a little research and turned up some interesting stuff.

I couldn’t find a single number from the FAA, mostly because it seems that the height requirements change depending on your distance from an airport. However, I did find these guidliens from the Washington state government which require anything over 150 feet to have a beacon. In addition, a search around the FAA site turned up this dense PDF titled “Development of Obstruction Lighting Standards for Wind Turbine Farms”, which I didn’t get all the way through, but outlines the requirements for wind turbine farms. In case you’re interested, here’s the recommendation:

Considering the lighting concepts currently used for illuminating radio towers and long-span bridges, which states that obstructions near to each other should be treated as if they were one large obstruction, a similar lighting concept was adopted for illuminating the wind turbine farms. The lighting concept for wind turbine farms includes the use of red, simultaneously flashing lights positioned on the outer perimeter of the wind turbine farm, each spaced no more than one-half statute mile from each other, and requires only one fixture per turbine. As long as the wind turbines are painted white in color, daytime illumination is not required.

Oh, and if you’re still hungry for more (which I can’t really imagine you are), here are somre more details on the light requirements from the beacons (another FAA PDF).