Posts Tagged ‘science’

Teapots + Superhydrophobicity = No Drips

Friday, November 13th, 2009

So remember back when we wrote about superhydrophobicity? Well we just ran across another interesting use of the coating that repels water: Teapots. Apparently some scientists have figured out how to stop them from dripping all over the place. Here’s the explanation from the physics arXiv blog:

Now Cyril Duez at the University of Lyon in France and a few amis, have identified the single factor at the heart of the problem and shown how to tackle it. They say that the culprit is a “hydro-capillary” effect that keeps the liquid in contact with the material as it leaves the lip. The previously identified factors all determine the strength of this hydro-cappillary effect.

So how to overcome it? There are two ways say Duez and co. The first is to make the lip as thin as possible. That’s why teapots with spouts made from thin metal are less likely to dribble.

The second is to coat the lip with the latest generation of superhydrophobic materials which strongly repel water. Duez and co show how this stops dribbling at a stroke. “Superhydrophobic surfaces fully avoid dripping, and thus beat the “teapot effect”,” they say.

Gotta love science solving everyday problems. [Link via Sciblogs]

How X-Ray Tubes Works

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Ever wonder how an x-ray works? So did we. Luckily the nice folks at GE were kind enough to explain on a model:

What is a Henry?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

While we were in Milwaukee we saw a sales presentation for a new MRI machine. Its a pretty funny thing, the marketing of MRI machines – the features are really esoteric, and you need a crane and a reinforced concrete floor to get it into it’s new home.

One of the features touted in a powerpoint we saw is that the new model MRI machine has 5,700 Henrys. At which point Adam the aerospace engineer said “holy crap”. Noah and I said “what’s a Henry?”

So we look it up and a Henry is this: Haha kidding. I don’t understand this equation. But I did some research!

In any situation involving electricity, there is a magnetic field generated by the electricity passing through a circuit, and the field causes a certain amount of interference with the passage of electricity, and the amount of magnetic interference is called inductance.

One unit of inductance is a Henry, and if you are trying to transmit electricity efficiently, you don’t want a lot of Henrys. However! If you are trying to make the mightiest magnets ever for your magnetic imaging device, you want all the Henrys you can get.

So basically, a Henry is more or less the “horsepower” of the MRI industry.

The GE Reading List

Friday, June 26th, 2009

So a few weeks ago we asked folks at GE what they were reading. They gave us lots of great books and we’ve now compiled them into a little Amazon reading list to make it easy for you to buy anything on the list. We’d like to keep expanding this, so feel free to add your books in the comments.

And without any further ado: What’s GE Reading? (On Amazon)

Good News for Engineering

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

One of the things we’ve discussed a lot around here is the goal of getting more young people interested in science. As a company GE needs more folks like this and as a country it seems to have fallen out of fashion.

Christian Science Monitor had a bit of good news in this area:

Across the United States, enrollment in engineering programs has risen to levels not seen in three decades. The recession appears to be one factor, as students and their parents look for dependable careers.

But some education officials detect a shift in opinion about the profession itself, as global warming and stem-cell research make fields like chemical and bioengineering more than just wise choices for job-seekers – but fashionable ones, too.

While the article acknowledges the US is still behind in producing engineers, it’s a good sign.

Bringing the Magic Back to Science

Monday, May 11th, 2009

There is a really amazing profile in last weeks New Yorker about a neuroscientist named Vilayanur S. Ramachandran (unfortunately the full text of the article is only available to subscribers). One of the things that struck me about the piece is how Ramachandran described why he found science so fascinating:

In his early teens, Ramachandran began conducting experiments in chemistry and biology in a makeshift laboratory under the staircase in the family’s house in Bangkok, where his father was stationed. He also read books on the history of science and was struck by the role of intuition and play in many important discoveries: Galileo adapting a child’s spyglass and discovering the moons of Jupiter, which led him to challenge the geocentric model of the universe; Faraday tinkering with a magnet and coil and discovering electromagnetism. Rahamchandran often recounts these anecdotes to his students. “These stories are inspirational and fun,” he told me. “But they’re also telling you about how to do science.”

I’ve been telling everyone I see to read this article since I finished it a few days ago and have been thinking non-stop (I wrote a a little more about it and him at my personal blog). It struck me over the weekend that part of our big goal of making science cool needs to be to bring back the kind of magic Ramachandran describes. While experimentation and data is a huge aspect, intuition and curiosity can play an equally large role.

How Often Do You Get to Rethink Your Laws?

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Building off the other nano posts, this video is a highlight reel of our conversation with the nanotechnology folks. Specifically, we spliced together a nice little summary of what and why nano from Margaret Blohm, who manages the nanotechnology department.


Also, here’s a longer version from the GE Reports YouTube channel:

Attn: Scientists – what is your daily routine?

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

I found this on the fairly excellent and new-old-fashioned 1001 rules for my unborn son blog – it is the daily routine of young James Gatz (aka The Great Gatsby), and seems to be a healthy combination of baseball and studying needed inventions. haha. So it got me curious about the daily routines of scientists and engineers – I figure our audience here includes professional and armchair scientists, engineers, coders, so:

What is your daily routine? How do you break up your day, at home and work, in terms of scientific pursuits, is it regimented or does it vary from day to day? The image above struck me because the studying is presented as a form of exercise, for the brain, along with baseball, elocution, and “etc.”. Post in the comments your daily routine of work and brain/body exercise, or lack thereof!

Science and Entertainment Exchange

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

science and entertainment exchange

Whoa, this sounds a lot like what we’re doing! (Sorry it’s so long, I didn’t know where to cut.)

The portrayal of science – its practitioners, its methods, its effects – has often posed a challenge to the entertainment community. Though it has inspired some of the most intelligent and compelling storylines, science’s many complexities have confounded even the most talented writer, director, or producer, time and again pitting creative license against scientific authenticity and clarity.

Likewise, the scientific community has struggled to find an effective conduit through which it can communicate its story accurately and effectively. Though many of the world’s biggest problems require scientific solutions, finding a way to translate and depict scientific findings so that reach a wide audience has required a sounding board that has often been missing.

The Science & Entertainment Exchange bridges this gap and addresses the mutual need of the two communities by providing the credibility and the verisimilitude upon which quality entertainment depends – and which audiences have come to expect. Drawing on the deep knowledge of the scientific community, we can collaborate on narrative and visual solutions to a variety of problems while contributing directly to the creativity of the content in fresh and unexpected ways.

We should totally get involved. (via Biocurious)